Now that the dust has settled after this week’s “Breaking News” regarding the proposed changes to the Massachusetts data security regulations, here is an analysis of what the changes actually mean to the business community. Some other interesting commentary is linked below: Evan Schuman – Storefront Backtalk
Tag Archives: 201 CMR 17.00
BREAKING NEWS – Changes to 201 CMR 17.00
Posted By Cynthia Larose on Posted in LegislationJust released – proposed amendments to the Massachusetts data security regulations — and a three-month extension of time to comply. Stay tuned for a full analysis.
Seminar today on compliance with Massachusetts Data Security Regulations
Posted By Cynthia Larose on Posted in Data Compliance & SecurityTwitter feed from the event — http://twitter.com/ITcompliance
Search
Subscribe
Subscribe with RSS
Recent Posts
- Even in Privacy Cases, Risk of Injury Does not Always Equal Injury
- Privacy Monday: July 14, 2014
- Backlash Over Facebook Timeline Experiment Serves as a Reminder: User Expectations Still Trump Fine Print
- Hulu Scores a Victory (at least temporarily) in Avoiding Class Certification
- Privacy Monday – June 30, 2014
- Wyndham Gets Life Preserver in Data Breach Case
- SCOTUS to Police on Cellphone Searches: “Get a warrant”
- D’oh! OCR Confirms that Medical Records Should Not be Left in the Driveway
- To our US Readers: Your Privacy & Security Matters Blog Public Service for Thursday, June 26
- Massachusetts High Court Permits Compelled Decryption of Seized Digital Evidence
- Privacy Monday – June 23, 2014
- Five Lessons from OCR’s Report to Congress on Breaches and HIPAA Rules Compliance
- Round Two for Snapchat: Agreement with the Maryland Attorney General Settling Claims of Consumer Deception and COPPA Violations
- Save the Date: San Francisco Privacy Event
- “May I have your ZIP Code?” Retailers may want to read this….
- Privacy Tuesday – June 17, 2014
- Calling All Boards of Directors: Four Recommendations from the SEC
- Privacy Monday: June 9, 2014
- Health Data Breach Victims Have Standing to Sue Says WV Supreme Court
- Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege: Making Sure What’s Said In House Stays In House
- Privacy Monday – June 2, 2014
- USA: National Moment of Remembrance 5/26/14
- My company isn’t a search engine. Why should I care about Google Spain?
- How Online Advertisers May Steal Your Personal Information: Recommendations for Protecting Consumers
Topics
- 201 CMR 17.00
- Children
- Class Action Litigation
- Cloud Computing
- Cyber Risks Boardroom Series
- Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity
- Data Breach
- Data Breach Notification
- Data Compliance & Security
- Employee Privacy
- EU Data Protection Regulation
- European Court of Justice
- European Union
- Events and Webinars
- Federal Trade Commission
- HIPAA/HITECH
- Identity Theft
- Insurance
- Legislation
- Mobile Privacy
- Online Advertising
- Privacy Litigation
- Privacy Monday
- Privacy Regulation
- Secure Traveling
- Security
- Social Media
- Uncategorized
- US Supreme Court
Mintz Levin Blogs
- Consumer Product Matters
- Copyright & Trademark Matters
- Employment Matters
- Energy & Clean Tech Matters
- Global IP Matters
- Health Law & Policy Matters
- Immigration Law
- Public Finance Matters
- Securities Litigation & Compliance Matters
- Technology Matters
Stay Connected
Related Links
- Mintz Matrix of State Data Breach Notification Laws
- Mintz Levin's Website
- The Data Breach Count
Meet the Editor
Meet the Contributors
Related Blogs
- Canadian Privacy Law Blog
- Compliance Building
- EFF.org Updates
- PogoWasRight
- Ponemon Institute Blog
- RFID Talk
- Schneier on Security
- The Data Breach Blog
- The Technology Liberation Front
- Threat Level
Resources
- ACLU Washington's Privacy Page
- Center for Democracy & Technology
- Privacy.org
- Trust.e "Privacy Central"
- WashPost "Privacy Page"
- Wired News